New York Times Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement in AI Training

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

September 4, 2024
|
By Jiten Surve

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The lawsuit contends that the unauthorized use of the Times' copyrighted articles and content for AI development undermines the newspaper's ability to deliver its services. Emphasizing the significance of independent journalism in democracy, the lawsuit highlights the unique value of the Times' reporting.

This legal move by the publisher echoes similar cases, including actions by authors and other entities concerned about the proliferation of AI systems using copyrighted material without proper authorization.

There’s growing concern around AI models using content without providing proper credit or incentives to access the original sources. Despite ongoing discussions between the New York Times and OpenAI, marked by attempts to find a resolution, the lawsuit emerged following a deadlock in negotiations.

The lawsuit also raises concerns about AI-generated "hallucinations," instances where false information gets linked incorrectly to a source. It points to instances on Microsoft's Bing Chat where content was attributed to the Times inaccurately.

While the lawsuit doesn’t specify a monetary claim, it urges accountability from OpenAI (valued at $80 billion) and Microsoft (valued at $2.8 trillion) for significant statutory and actual damages. It also demands the destruction of any AI models or training data utilizing copyrighted material from the Times.

Amidst these tensions, OpenAI has announced partnerships aimed at addressing concerns over content usage. One recent collaboration involves working with Axel Springer, a major German publishing company, to incorporate authoritative content into ChatGPT while ensuring proper attribution and transparency to original sources.

Microsoft has yet to comment on the lawsuit, while OpenAI expressed surprise and disappointment over the legal action, citing ongoing, constructive discussions with the New York Times.

  • Featured tools
WellSaid Ai
Free

WellSaid AI is an advanced text-to-speech platform that transforms written text into lifelike, human-quality voiceovers.

#
Text to Speech
Learn more
Figstack AI
Free

Figstack AI is an intelligent assistant for developers that explains code, generates docstrings, converts code between languages, and analyzes time complexity helping you work smarter, not harder.

#
Coding
Learn more

Learn more about future of AI

Join 80,000+ Ai enthusiast getting weekly updates on exciting AI tools.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

New York Times Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement in AI Training

September 4, 2024

By Jiten Surve

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The lawsuit contends that the unauthorized use of the Times' copyrighted articles and content for AI development undermines the newspaper's ability to deliver its services. Emphasizing the significance of independent journalism in democracy, the lawsuit highlights the unique value of the Times' reporting.

This legal move by the publisher echoes similar cases, including actions by authors and other entities concerned about the proliferation of AI systems using copyrighted material without proper authorization.

There’s growing concern around AI models using content without providing proper credit or incentives to access the original sources. Despite ongoing discussions between the New York Times and OpenAI, marked by attempts to find a resolution, the lawsuit emerged following a deadlock in negotiations.

The lawsuit also raises concerns about AI-generated "hallucinations," instances where false information gets linked incorrectly to a source. It points to instances on Microsoft's Bing Chat where content was attributed to the Times inaccurately.

While the lawsuit doesn’t specify a monetary claim, it urges accountability from OpenAI (valued at $80 billion) and Microsoft (valued at $2.8 trillion) for significant statutory and actual damages. It also demands the destruction of any AI models or training data utilizing copyrighted material from the Times.

Amidst these tensions, OpenAI has announced partnerships aimed at addressing concerns over content usage. One recent collaboration involves working with Axel Springer, a major German publishing company, to incorporate authoritative content into ChatGPT while ensuring proper attribution and transparency to original sources.

Microsoft has yet to comment on the lawsuit, while OpenAI expressed surprise and disappointment over the legal action, citing ongoing, constructive discussions with the New York Times.

Promote Your Tool

Copy Embed Code

Similar Blogs

August 14, 2026
|

Benefitfocus Expands Digital Benefits Administration

Benefitfocus provides cloud-based technology covering benefits enrollment, administration, communications, billing, payments and data exchange.
Read more
August 14, 2026
|

Travel Agent Revenue Models Evolve Digitally

Travel agencies can earn commissions when customers book hotels, cruises, tours, vacation packages and other travel products through them. Suppliers may pay agents for generating bookings, making commissions a traditional component of agency revenue.
Read more
August 14, 2026
|

Sofon Advances Guided Selling CPQ Automation

Sofon's platform combines guided selling, product configuration, pricing, quotation and sales-management capabilities. Guided questionnaires help sales teams identify customer requirements and translate them into suitable product configurations.
Read more
August 14, 2026
|

WellRyde Advances Medical Transportation Management

WellRyde provides technology for managing non-emergency medical transportation operations, including trip scheduling, dispatch coordination, transportation-provider management and reporting.
Read more
August 14, 2026
|

Review WAVE Advances Digital Patient Engagement

Review WAVE provides healthcare practices with tools for online appointment scheduling, two-way texting, automated appointment reminders, digital forms, web chat, marketing campaigns and online review generation.
Read more
August 14, 2026
|

Edgenuity Expands Digital Virtual Education

Edgenuity provides digital curriculum and learning solutions covering core academic subjects, electives, Advanced Placement and career-oriented education.
Read more