New York Times Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement in AI Training

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

September 4, 2024
|
By Jiten Surve

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The lawsuit contends that the unauthorized use of the Times' copyrighted articles and content for AI development undermines the newspaper's ability to deliver its services. Emphasizing the significance of independent journalism in democracy, the lawsuit highlights the unique value of the Times' reporting.

This legal move by the publisher echoes similar cases, including actions by authors and other entities concerned about the proliferation of AI systems using copyrighted material without proper authorization.

There’s growing concern around AI models using content without providing proper credit or incentives to access the original sources. Despite ongoing discussions between the New York Times and OpenAI, marked by attempts to find a resolution, the lawsuit emerged following a deadlock in negotiations.

The lawsuit also raises concerns about AI-generated "hallucinations," instances where false information gets linked incorrectly to a source. It points to instances on Microsoft's Bing Chat where content was attributed to the Times inaccurately.

While the lawsuit doesn’t specify a monetary claim, it urges accountability from OpenAI (valued at $80 billion) and Microsoft (valued at $2.8 trillion) for significant statutory and actual damages. It also demands the destruction of any AI models or training data utilizing copyrighted material from the Times.

Amidst these tensions, OpenAI has announced partnerships aimed at addressing concerns over content usage. One recent collaboration involves working with Axel Springer, a major German publishing company, to incorporate authoritative content into ChatGPT while ensuring proper attribution and transparency to original sources.

Microsoft has yet to comment on the lawsuit, while OpenAI expressed surprise and disappointment over the legal action, citing ongoing, constructive discussions with the New York Times.

  • Featured tools
Neuron AI
Free

Neuron AI is an AI-driven content optimization platform that helps creators produce SEO-friendly content by combining semantic SEO, competitor analysis, and AI-assisted writing workflows.

#
SEO
Learn more
Outplay AI
Free

Outplay AI is a dynamic sales engagement platform combining AI-powered outreach, multi-channel automation, and performance tracking to help teams optimize conversion and pipeline generation.

#
Sales
Learn more

Learn more about future of AI

Join 80,000+ Ai enthusiast getting weekly updates on exciting AI tools.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

New York Times Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement in AI Training

September 4, 2024

By Jiten Surve

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The lawsuit contends that the unauthorized use of the Times' copyrighted articles and content for AI development undermines the newspaper's ability to deliver its services. Emphasizing the significance of independent journalism in democracy, the lawsuit highlights the unique value of the Times' reporting.

This legal move by the publisher echoes similar cases, including actions by authors and other entities concerned about the proliferation of AI systems using copyrighted material without proper authorization.

There’s growing concern around AI models using content without providing proper credit or incentives to access the original sources. Despite ongoing discussions between the New York Times and OpenAI, marked by attempts to find a resolution, the lawsuit emerged following a deadlock in negotiations.

The lawsuit also raises concerns about AI-generated "hallucinations," instances where false information gets linked incorrectly to a source. It points to instances on Microsoft's Bing Chat where content was attributed to the Times inaccurately.

While the lawsuit doesn’t specify a monetary claim, it urges accountability from OpenAI (valued at $80 billion) and Microsoft (valued at $2.8 trillion) for significant statutory and actual damages. It also demands the destruction of any AI models or training data utilizing copyrighted material from the Times.

Amidst these tensions, OpenAI has announced partnerships aimed at addressing concerns over content usage. One recent collaboration involves working with Axel Springer, a major German publishing company, to incorporate authoritative content into ChatGPT while ensuring proper attribution and transparency to original sources.

Microsoft has yet to comment on the lawsuit, while OpenAI expressed surprise and disappointment over the legal action, citing ongoing, constructive discussions with the New York Times.

Promote Your Tool

Copy Embed Code

Similar Blogs

July 10, 2026
|

Swiss Bank Warns AI Investment Bubble Risks

Raiffeisen’s chief economist has cautioned investors about the possibility of an AI-driven investment bubble, pointing to rapidly increasing valuations and strong market expectations surrounding artificial intelligence companies.
Read more
July 10, 2026
|

Swiss Ethics Proposal Faces Limited Support

A Swiss government-backed counter-proposal on corporate responsibility has struggled to gain strong support, raising questions about the future direction of ethical business regulation in the country.
Read more
July 10, 2026
|

SWISS Faces IT Disruption Compensation Claims

SWISS is investigating claims for compensation after a Skyguide IT outage affected air traffic management operations and created disruptions across the aviation sector.
Read more
July 10, 2026
|

Moleculent Advances Spatial Biology Discovery

Moleculent’s $20 million funding round will support the development and commercialization of its spatial biology technology, which focuses on mapping molecular interactions within tissue samples.
Read more
July 10, 2026
|

G&W Electric Acquires Safegrid Grid Innovation

G&W Electric’s acquisition of Safegrid brings together established grid equipment expertise with advanced monitoring technology designed to improve power network visibility and operational efficiency.
Read more
July 10, 2026
|

Pit Raises $16M Enterprise Data Funding

Pit’s $16 million funding round, backed by prominent venture investors including Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), will support the company’s mission to build a new layer of enterprise workflow infrastructure.
Read more