New York Times Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement in AI Training

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

September 4, 2024
|
By Jiten Surve

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The lawsuit contends that the unauthorized use of the Times' copyrighted articles and content for AI development undermines the newspaper's ability to deliver its services. Emphasizing the significance of independent journalism in democracy, the lawsuit highlights the unique value of the Times' reporting.

This legal move by the publisher echoes similar cases, including actions by authors and other entities concerned about the proliferation of AI systems using copyrighted material without proper authorization.

There’s growing concern around AI models using content without providing proper credit or incentives to access the original sources. Despite ongoing discussions between the New York Times and OpenAI, marked by attempts to find a resolution, the lawsuit emerged following a deadlock in negotiations.

The lawsuit also raises concerns about AI-generated "hallucinations," instances where false information gets linked incorrectly to a source. It points to instances on Microsoft's Bing Chat where content was attributed to the Times inaccurately.

While the lawsuit doesn’t specify a monetary claim, it urges accountability from OpenAI (valued at $80 billion) and Microsoft (valued at $2.8 trillion) for significant statutory and actual damages. It also demands the destruction of any AI models or training data utilizing copyrighted material from the Times.

Amidst these tensions, OpenAI has announced partnerships aimed at addressing concerns over content usage. One recent collaboration involves working with Axel Springer, a major German publishing company, to incorporate authoritative content into ChatGPT while ensuring proper attribution and transparency to original sources.

Microsoft has yet to comment on the lawsuit, while OpenAI expressed surprise and disappointment over the legal action, citing ongoing, constructive discussions with the New York Times.

  • Featured tools
Upscayl AI
Free

Upscayl AI is a free, open-source AI-powered tool that enhances and upscales images to higher resolutions. It transforms blurry or low-quality visuals into sharp, detailed versions with ease.

#
Productivity
Learn more
Symphony Ayasdi AI
Free

SymphonyAI Sensa is an AI-powered surveillance and financial crime detection platform that surfaces hidden risk behavior through explainable, AI-driven analytics.

#
Finance
Learn more

Learn more about future of AI

Join 80,000+ Ai enthusiast getting weekly updates on exciting AI tools.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

New York Times Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement in AI Training

September 4, 2024

By Jiten Surve

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The lawsuit contends that the unauthorized use of the Times' copyrighted articles and content for AI development undermines the newspaper's ability to deliver its services. Emphasizing the significance of independent journalism in democracy, the lawsuit highlights the unique value of the Times' reporting.

This legal move by the publisher echoes similar cases, including actions by authors and other entities concerned about the proliferation of AI systems using copyrighted material without proper authorization.

There’s growing concern around AI models using content without providing proper credit or incentives to access the original sources. Despite ongoing discussions between the New York Times and OpenAI, marked by attempts to find a resolution, the lawsuit emerged following a deadlock in negotiations.

The lawsuit also raises concerns about AI-generated "hallucinations," instances where false information gets linked incorrectly to a source. It points to instances on Microsoft's Bing Chat where content was attributed to the Times inaccurately.

While the lawsuit doesn’t specify a monetary claim, it urges accountability from OpenAI (valued at $80 billion) and Microsoft (valued at $2.8 trillion) for significant statutory and actual damages. It also demands the destruction of any AI models or training data utilizing copyrighted material from the Times.

Amidst these tensions, OpenAI has announced partnerships aimed at addressing concerns over content usage. One recent collaboration involves working with Axel Springer, a major German publishing company, to incorporate authoritative content into ChatGPT while ensuring proper attribution and transparency to original sources.

Microsoft has yet to comment on the lawsuit, while OpenAI expressed surprise and disappointment over the legal action, citing ongoing, constructive discussions with the New York Times.

Promote Your Tool

Copy Embed Code

Similar Blogs

March 13, 2026
|

Alibaba Releases OpenClaw App in China AI Race

Alibaba has introduced the OpenClaw app, a platform designed to support the growing ecosystem of “agentic AI” systems capable of performing tasks autonomously with minimal human intervention.
Read more
March 13, 2026
|

Meta Adds AI Tools to Boost Facebook Marketplace

Meta has rolled out a suite of artificial intelligence features designed to make selling items on Facebook Marketplace faster and more efficient. The tools can automatically generate product descriptions.
Read more
March 13, 2026
|

Proprietary Data Emerges as Key Advantage in AI

Analysts at S&P Global report that software companies with extensive proprietary data assets are likely to remain resilient as artificial intelligence transforms the technology sector.
Read more
March 13, 2026
|

ByteDance Gains Access to Nvidia AI Chips

ByteDance has obtained access to Nvidia’s high-end AI chips, which are widely considered essential for training and running advanced artificial intelligence models.
Read more
March 13, 2026
|

China Leads Global Rise of Agentic AI Platforms

Chinese technology companies and developers are rapidly experimenting with OpenClaw, an open-source platform designed to create autonomous AI agents capable of performing tasks.
Read more
March 13, 2026
|

Meta Acquires Social Network to Grow AI Ecosystem

Meta confirmed that the Moltbook acquisition will bring AI agent networking capabilities into its portfolio, allowing autonomous AI entities to interact, share data, and perform tasks collaboratively.
Read more