
A sharp debate has resurfaced over the global AI economy after comments by US trade advisor Peter Navarro suggested American AI firms were “helping” India. A closer examination reveals a more transactional reality India has become a critical labour, data, and engineering backbone powering US AI dominance.
The article challenges claims that American AI companies are acting charitably in India, arguing instead that Indian talent plays a foundational role in building, training, and scaling global AI systems. From data labelling and model training to software engineering and customer support, Indian workers are deeply embedded across AI value chains.
Major US AI firms rely on India’s large, skilled, and cost-efficient workforce to accelerate development and reduce operational costs. This dependency is often underplayed in political narratives focused on national competitiveness. The piece highlights how value creation is global, while value capture profits, IP ownership, and strategic control—remains concentrated in the United States.
The development aligns with a broader trend across global markets where AI innovation is increasingly decoupled from national borders, even as political rhetoric becomes more protectionist. Over the past decade, India has emerged as a preferred destination for technology services, engineering talent, and large-scale data operations.
As AI models have grown more complex and data-hungry, demand for human-in-the-loop processes annotation, reinforcement learning, quality control has surged. India’s workforce has filled this gap at scale.
Geopolitically, this dynamic mirrors earlier phases of globalisation in software and manufacturing, where developing economies supplied labour while developed markets controlled capital and intellectual property. The AI era is replicating this structure, but at far greater speed and strategic importance.
Technology analysts argue that India is not a passive beneficiary but an essential enabler of the global AI ecosystem. Experts note that without Indian engineers, data workers, and service providers, many US AI companies would struggle to scale at current speeds or costs.
Industry leaders in India increasingly stress that the country is moving beyond back-office roles toward higher-value AI engineering, model optimisation, and platform development. However, analysts warn that unless India captures more intellectual property and platform ownership, it risks remaining a supplier rather than a strategic beneficiary.
From a policy lens, commentators suggest that narratives portraying AI collaboration as “aid” obscure the asymmetric power dynamics embedded in global technology markets.
For global businesses, the reality underscores India’s strategic importance as an AI execution hub, not a peripheral market. Multinationals may deepen investments in Indian R&D centres, talent pipelines, and AI operations.
For investors, the debate highlights long-term opportunities in Indian AI services, platforms, and startups seeking to move up the value chain. Policymakers, meanwhile, face pressure to craft strategies that ensure India captures greater economic value from IP creation to sovereign AI infrastructure.
For executives, the message is clear: AI leadership is globally distributed, even if profits and narratives are not.
Looking ahead, scrutiny over who truly benefits from the AI boom is expected to intensify. Governments may push for fairer value distribution, data localisation, and talent retention strategies. As AI becomes central to economic power, India’s role could shift from invisible workforce to visible stakeholder—provided policy, capital, and innovation align.
Source & Date
Source: India Today
Date: January 19, 2026

